Plenary meeting of the State Duma. Image - Wikimedia Commons

The Law Prohibiting People Involved in Activities of Extremist Organizations from Participating in Elections Is Adopted

The President of Russia approved the law prohibiting those who are "involved" in the activities of an extremist organization from running in elections.

On June 4, 2021, Vladimir Putin approved the law that affects the standards related to "Basic guarantees of electoral rights" and "Elections of deputies to the State Duma". The law prevents the persons in any way "involved" in the activities of an extremist or terrorist organization from running in an election of any government body. The law shall come into force from the date of its publication. It will affect the elections called after the day of its onset.

The draft law was submitted to the Duma on May 4, 2021, by members of the Foreign intervention commission. On May 18, 2021, it was adopted at the first reading. On May 21, State Duma deputy Pavel Krasheninnikov and senator Andrey Klishas made significant amendments to the draft law, while preparing it for the second reading. The second reading took place on May 25, and the third on May 26. The Federation Council approved the law on June 2.

According to the newly adopted legislation, the restriction of the passive suffrage right should apply to everyone who, in the three years preceding the entry into force of the decision to ban the respective organization, was: its founder, member of the collegial steering body, manager, deputy manager, head of a structural unit or its deputy; or within one year before the ban was applied to the respective organization, was: an activist, member, employee, or "any other person involved in the activities" of the organization (for example, provided financial, material, organizational, methodological, advisory, or any other support and assistance).

In the first case (applicable to founders, etc. ) the limitation of passive suffrage will be maintained for five years from the date of entry into force of the court decision banning or liquidating an extremist/terrorist organization. In the second case (involving activists, etc. ) the limitation will be valid for three years after the ban.

Involvement in the activities of an extremist or terrorist organization will include such actions as:

  • "direct implementation of goals and/or types of an activity (including separate events), in connection with which an organization was recognized as extremist or terrorist";
  • "verbal approval" (including phrases on the Internet) of such goals and types of activity, as well as of the organization itself;
  • provision of financial, material, organizational, methodological, advisory, and other support and assistance to the prohibited organization.

Such "involvement" in a prohibited organization shall be established by a "court decision which has taken effect".

We believe that the wording of the law leaves much room for interpretation. For example, it does not indicate whether a court decision, establishing a person's "involvement" in the activities of a banned organization, should be made within the framework of a separate trial against this very person. Also, the legislation does not provide for a special procedure enabling the court to establish such "involvement". On the one hand, charges under the "extremism-related" articles of both the Criminal code and the Administrative Code can be applied now, and, according to the current legislation, the person brought to justice will still lose their passive suffrage. On the other hand, the articles of the codes are not retroactive. Therefore it is possible to convict a person for financing such an organization only if it's proven that the accused had been aware of their financing extremist/terrorist activities before the process of banning the organization even started.

The problem lies in the arbitrary, broad judicial interpretation of a person's involvement in a particular organization. A separate court decision that a given person is involved in the activities of organization X is not required. It is sufficient for the court to establish such a fact within the framework of the examination of any case in which both the given person and the organization X appear, and where any connection between them is mentioned. This connection itself does not have to be the subject of significant dispute in court, it is often just a general statement that is not even questioned by the lawyer, because the case did not concern the given person, but someone else. In this form, the court may consider the fact of the connection between the given person and the organization X established.

All in all, the adopted amendments indicate a progressive attack on freedom of association in Russia. The ambiguity of the very term, "involved person", may lead to abuse in the enforcement of the law. Also, the constitutionality of the introduction of such indefinite limitations on passive suffrage (especially those extending to the period preceding the law's entry into force) raises serious doubts among legal experts. In this case, deprivation of the right to run in an election can be considered a form of punishment, which, according to Art. 54 of the Russian Constitution, cannot be imposed for actions that were not illegal at the time of their accomplishment.


Draft law No. 1165649-7 "On amendments to Art. 4 of the Federal Law "Basic guarantees of electoral rights and the Right to participate in a referendum of citizens of the Russian Federation" and Art. 4 of the Federal Law "On election of deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Council of the Russian Federation" (part related to limitation of passive suffrage for persons involved in the activities of extremist or terrorist organizations)" | Legislative provision system "Zakonotvorchestvo". 2021. June 2.

Putin banned extremists from participating in elections .... 2021. June 4.


Originally published by SOVA Information and Analytical Center at, translated with permission.

Ballot stuffing, elections March 18, 2018, Lyubertsy. Image - Golos

Less than two months before the elections, the Russian Central Election Commission (CEC) decided to scrap open video broadcasts from the polling stations, which have been the feature of Russian elections since 2012.

1st of May Demonstration in Moscow. 2010. Image - Flickr/TMY7892

PART 1: United Russia

According to sociologists, the same four parties represented in the parliament now: United Russia, the Communist Party of Russian Federation (CPRF), the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), and Just Russia will probably be elected again in 2021. How are these four parties organized? What is their support base in regions?

Ballot box for voting on Constitutional Amendments 2020. Photo - Wikimedia Commons

Since the last State Duma elections in 2016, lawmakers have introduced 19 amendments to the election law. In the year leading up to the State Duma elections in September 2021 alone, seven significant legislative amendments have been introduced, six of them in less than four months before the start of the campaign.

TV reporter, Bryansk. Photo - pxfuel

After almost a decade of crackdowns on big players, the landscape of critical journalism in Russia is dominated by local or smaller niche projects. But if the 2020-2021 trend of relentless attacks on media, journalists, and bloggers continues, many of these small projects are not likely to survive into the autumn. The regime makes it pretty clear that it no longer intends to tolerate any dissent.

"1941- ssshhh!" - Image by James Vaughan / flickr

The laws on "foreign agent" and "undesirable organizations" continue to hamper the work of affected organizations, stigmatize and damage their reputation, and isolate the civil society from international cooperation and support. What are these provisions and how are they being applied?

Vladimir Putin Speech at State Duma plenary session 2020-03-10. Image - Wikimedia Commons

The Russian State Duma's seventh convocation is coming to the end of its five-year term. And according to a new report from iStories and, dozens of its deputies haven't said a word in a parliamentary session since they were elected in 2016. Others haven't put forward a single bill. Be that as it may, this hasn't stopped these lawmakers from collecting high salaries and planning to put their names on the ballot for the State Duma election coming up in September.

Kaluga. A Holiday. Image - flickr

During the United Russia primaries, experts detected possible falsification of the results and instances of interference in the electronic voting process. According to some analyses, 99% of votes for the first 22 candidates on the United Russia party list were falsified while the amount of falsified votes for candidates in single-mandate constituencies reached 80-95% of the votes cast.

Arrest by the police. Image - Wikimedia Commons

According to election observers, recent amendments further limiting citizens' passive suffrage constitute a "fifth wave" of depriving Russians of their right to stand for election since the collapse of the USSR. New restrictions have a particular impact on politically active citizens.

Programming, computing and information concept. Image - Peshkova, Getty Images Pro

In May, the Russian Federation has tested a new system of remote electronic voting. The Movement in Defense of Voters’ Rights "Golos" observed the testing phase, took part in the voting, and shared their conclusions and recommendations in a respective report.

"I have the right to choose!" Photo - EPDE.

Opportunities for independent citizen election observation and civil society space in general have been shrinking steadily in Russia over the past decade. Recently, further restrictions have been adopted that limit the ability of citizens to independently monitor electoral processes.

Russian police prevents an illegal meeting at city center. Photo by Farhad Sadykov/flickr. CC BY 2.0

Over the past 14 years, the authorities have blocked 120,000 candidates from participating in elections of various levels, depriving millions of Russian citizens of the right to choose their representatives.

A demonstration in Moscow. Image - by Andrey, Pxhere.

Russia has finally outlawed Alexey Navalny's political and anti-corruption movement. Here's how the crackdown affects activists, journalists, and ordinary supporters.

Plenary meeting of the State Duma. Image - Wikimedia Commons

The President of Russia approved the law prohibiting those who are "involved" in the activities of an extremist organization from running in elections.

Electoral headquarters of Alexey Navalny. Photo - Wikimedia Commons

On June 9, the Moscow City Court, based on the charges by the Moscow Prosecutor's Office, recognized the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), the Foundation for the Protection of Citizens' Rights, and the headquarters of Alexei Navalny as extremist organizations. Now, many citizens are under a threat of pressure and persecution.

Vladimir Putin at the United Russia Congress (2011-11-27). Image - Wikimedia Commons

Between May 24 and 30, United Russia held its preliminary selection of candidates for 2021 State Duma elections. Nearly 12 million citizens participated in the party's primaries. Yet, a more careful examination shows an increasingly controlled and non-transparent process, aimed at having the public formally 'endorse' a carefully vetted list of pre-selected candidates.

Meeting of Central Election Commission Chair Ella Pamfilova with OSCE / ODIHR Director Matteo Mecacci. Photo - CEC

Between 2003 and 2018, OSCE/ODIHR published 139 recommendations on how to improve the conduct of elections in Russia. In the run-up to the State Duma elections in 2021, Russia has fully implemented just over 10% of them. Some have been tackled more promptly than others.

Man using computers. Photo by: Lisa Fotios from Pexels

Ahead of the State Duma election on September 19, 2021, Russia just tested its remote electronic voting system. While the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation (CEC) is preparing the report about the results of the test, election monitors say Russia's electronic voting system is a black box.

Alexei Navalny. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

The Russian authorities are expected to orchestrate a result in the upcoming State Duma elections that will give United Russia a clear majority of seats. This does not mean, however, that the manipulation of the electoral process by the authorities is complete. In a limited number of competitive districts, true opposition candidates including candidates who are associated with Aleksei Navalny have a real chance of winning if they are allowed to run. In recent weeks, steps have been taken to block these 'undesirable' candidates from participating.

Central Election Commission (CEC) of Russian Federation during April 21, 2021, meeting. Photo by: CEC.

On March 19, 2021, the new composition of the Central Election Commission (CEC) of the Russian Federation was revealed. Out of 15 members, eight new people joined the CEC. In particular, the new Commission has been 'reinforced' by bureaucrats from the Presidential Administration, the State Duma, and the Civic Chamber (a consultative civil society institution closely linked to the government).