Electoral headquarters of Alexey Navalny. Photo - Wikimedia Commons

Now Extremists. How Alexei Navalny's Supporters May Be Persecuted

On June 9, the Moscow City Court, based on the charges by the Moscow Prosecutor's Office, recognized the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), the Foundation for the Protection of Citizens' Rights (FPCR), and the headquarters of Alexei Navalny as extremist organizations. Now, many citizens are under a threat of pressure and persecution. We are offering an overview of several "anti-extremist" articles of the Administrative Code and the Criminal Code that may be applied to Navalny's supporters.

In addition to the newly introduced ban on running in any election (which has a retroactive effect on former leaders and members of "extremist" organizations), possible issues with accessing education and employment, there is a high probability of prosecution under the Administrative Code and the Criminal Code. You may learn about possible repercussions from our instructions prepared with the assistance of the SOVA Center for Information and Analysis, one of the areas of activity of which is the unlawful application of anti-extremist legislation. Below we examine the application of the relevant articles in more detail. This text was also prepared together with our colleagues from SOVA.


Distribution of materials

Persecution for distributing the symbols and materials of a banned organization on the Internet is possible even if it happened before the ban because if the publication continued to be available after the ban, it is considered a continuing offense. However, in order to prosecute for the distribution of materials, the materials themselves must be recognized as extremist.

The prosecution for the distribution of materials related to Navalny as extremist is already underway. Under the article on the production and distribution of extremist materials (20.29 of the Administrative Code), citizens have been persecuted for more than seven years for the video "Let's Remind Crooks and Thieves of Their Manifesto-2002", which was published on Alexei Navalny's blog and YouTube in October of 2011, and banned in the summer of 2013 by Kirov District Court of Novosibirsk and included on the Federal List of Extremist Materials. According to SOVA, in the last two years alone, more than 60 people have been brought to administrative responsibility because of the publication of this video. What is extremist in this video is unclear: it lists the unfulfilled election promises of United Russia and encourages voters to vote for any other party.

It cannot be ruled out that the same fate will befall some publications of Navalny's organizations or his own. It is known, for example, that more than a year after the banning of all organizations of Jehovah's Witnesses, almost 20 publications of this confession were declared extremist, including the "Holy Scripture - New World Translation," that is, the Bible translated by Jehovah's Witnesses. At the same time, the courts may not even take the trouble to assess what is extremist in a particular material - it is enough to identify the connection of the material with an already banned organization.

The number of persons charged under Article 20.29 of the Administrative Code in recent years, according to the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court, ranges from 1,590 to 1,960 people per year. For the court, when considering such a case, only the very fact of recognizing the material as extremist is important, no other arguments are taken into account. At the same time, there are already more than five thousand items on the Federal List of Extremist Materials. Not a single person can keep in mind which materials have already made it to the list, and the principles according to which it is compiled defy logic. The punishment under Art. 20.29 of the Administrative Code is a fine of up to three thousand rubles (approximately 34 EUR) or an administrative arrest of up to 15 days, and possible confiscation of materials and equipment used for their production.



"Propaganda or public display" of prohibited attributes or symbols, that is, Nazi symbols, as well as attributes or symbols of extremist organizations or others, "the propaganda or public display of which is prohibited by federal laws" (part 1 of article 20.3 of the Administrative Code) is punishable by a fine up to two thousand rubles (approximately 23 EUR) or an arrest of up to 15 days. For the production, sale, or purchase for propaganda purposes - the punishment is a fine of up to two and a half thousand rubles (approximately 29 EUR). According to the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court, in 2016-2018, approximately 1,650 to 1,790 people were charged under this article per year, in 2019 - 2,388 people, in 2020 - 2,279 people.

In most cases, the publication of any images with Nazi symbols, primarily with a swastika, becomes the reason for drawing up the protocols under this article. In order to prosecute for the "symbols of an extremist organization" a separate decision on the recognition of these symbols as extremist is not required. The symbols do not even have to be officially registered as the symbols of the respective organization.

Since the end of 2019, Article 20.3 of the Administrative Code contains a clause clarifying that cases when "a negative attitude to the ideology" of extremism is formed and "there are no signs of propaganda or justification" of extremist ideology should not fall under its effect. In practice, however, this aspect is rarely taken into account.

It is not always clear by what criteria the police and the court determine that a particular symbol is connected to an extremist organization. One may recall the story of the Khabarovsk activist Rostislav Smolensky - "Furgalomobil" (a food truck with campaigning posters) driver - who rode in front of a column of protesters at the marches in support of the former governor of the Khabarovsk Krai Sergei Furgal. Smolensky was detained in November of 2020 in Vladivostok, where he came to collect signatures for the release of Furgal.

In the protocol, police officers wrote that the amulet in the "Furgalmobile"'s cabin was a pendant with the image of the neo-pagan "Svarog square", which is the symbol of the Northern Brotherhood - a radical nationalist organization banned in 2012. Obviously, the "Svarog square" was not an officially registered symbol of the "Northern Brotherhood". At the same time, the court was not interested in whether Smolensky had anything to do with the banned organization and whether he was going to propagate its ideology. As a result, Smolensky was arrested for ten days. The court of appeal later admitted two reports from different experts to the case, refuting the conclusion based on which the arrest warrant was issued, but upheld the decision.

A few months earlier, in Moscow, the host of Channel One Yevgeny Kolesov, who heads the Power of the Law organization, was fined 1,000 rubles (11.5 EUR) under the same article and in connection with the same symbol; the prosecutor's office found "Svarog square" in the organization's logo. The examination of the logo, as Kolesov told OVD-Info, was carried out by a linguist who was not a heraldry specialist, and the resolution indicated a broken link to the Power of the Law video on YouTube.


Organization's activities

The most serious type of prosecution in connection with the prohibition of an organization as extremist is the application of Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code - on organizing (part 1), inclining, recruiting, involving (part 1.1) or participating in the activities (part 2) of an extremist organization. In the summer of 2016, the crimes provided for by this article were decided to be classified as grave, and the punishment under it became harsh.

Currently, one can receive a fine of up to 800,000 rubles (over 9,000 Euro) or imprisonment for up to 10 years under the charges of organizing the activities of an extremist organization; under the charges of recruitment - a fine of up to 700,000 rubles (approximately 8,000 Euro), forced labor for up to five years, or imprisonment for up to eight years; under the charges of participation in activities - a fine of up to 600,000 rubles (over 6,800 Euro), forced labor for up to four years, or imprisonment for up to six years. Punishments in the form of forced labor and imprisonment are accompanied by deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for various periods, as well as restraint of freedom for various periods after the end of labor or imprisonment.

Currently, both the FBK and Navalny's headquarters have stopped their activity. Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code does not have a retroactive effect, that is, a case cannot be initiated against a person for the fact that they participated or organized the activities of any of these organizations before they were banned. However, the investigation and the court could regard a different activity of the people associated with a banned organization as such that calls for prosecution.

The case of the Initiative Group for the Preparation of the Referendum "For Accountable Power", which, according to the court's decision, continued the activities of the banned "People's Will Army" organization, can serve as an example. The latter was banned for distributing the leaflet "You have elected - you are the judge!" in which it was proposed to amend the Constitution in order to provide voters with the opportunity to punish officials in various ways - up to the death penalty.

In August of 2017, Valery Parfenov and Kirill Barabash received four years in a general regime labor colony on charges of organizing the activities of an extremist organization (the court of appeal reduced the term to three years and ten months), RBK journalist Alexander Sokolov was sentenced to three and a half years in a general regime labor colony, and the former leader of the People's Will Army - Yuri Mukhin - received a four-year suspended sentence (apparently due to his advanced age). Another alleged participant, Vyacheslav Gorbaty, received a two-year suspended sentence in June of 2020. The case against the alleged organization's member Pavel Butko was dropped in December of 2015.

It is important to note that a person could be recognized as involved in the activities of an extremist organization even if their actions themselves do not constitute any crime. It can be any activity - for the investigation and the court, it is enough that it has a collective character and some, even indirect and poorly proven, relation to the goals of the banned organization. For example, as in the case of Jehovah's Witnesses, all of whose Russian communities were banned in April 2017, the continuation of the activities of an extremist organization in this case means religious activity itself: collective prayers, a study of relevant literature, sermons.

In recent years, several hundred people in no less than 61 regions have been persecuted under Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code on charges of involvement in Jehova's Witnesses communities. In 2019-2020, according to SOVA, at least 64 sentences were passed, at least 22 people received terms of up to six years inclusive (in 2021, one believer was sentenced to seven and a half years; earlier, six and a half years term was replaced with a conditional sentence). Followers of the Islamic religious movement Tablighi Jamaat are similarly persecuted (between 2017 and 2020, 85 people were convicted, 60 of them had been sentenced to real prison terms).

Paradoxically, prosecution for involvement in an extremist organization is possible even in the absence of an organization as such: for example, supporters of the ideas of the Turkish theologian Said Nursi, who are simply studying his works together, are accused of involvement in a certain extremist organization "Nurcular", which, according to experts, has never existed on the territory of Russia.

According to the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court, in 2016, 25 people were convicted under Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code (both as the main and as an additional charge), in 2017 three were 34 such persons, 41 in 2018, 67 in 2019, and 100 in 2020. These statistics take into account only decisions that have entered into force - in this regard, it is difficult to conclude anything about the dynamics since in some cases it can take more than two years between the decision of the court of the first instance and that of the court of appeal.

In addition, the data are difficult to compare with that of the SOVA Center, since the latter, on the contrary, considers decisions of the courts of the first instance. One way or another, it is obvious that the number of cases has grown over the years due to the persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses. However, so far, the overwhelming majority of those sentenced under this article are Muslims: SOVA has counted 128 people between 2016 and 2020 (the total number of those sentenced during this period, according to the organization, is 218 people).


Financing of activities

Finally, there is another criminal article that can be applied once Navalny's organizations are recognized as extremist: on the financing of extremist activities (282.3 of the Criminal Code). Prospective donors can be fined for up to 700,000 rubles over (8,000 Euro), sent for forced labor for up to four years with the deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for up to three years or without it and with the restraint of freedom for up to one year , or imprisonment for up to eight years.

On the whole, there were few such cases. According to the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court, in 2016 and 2017, one verdict was issued under Article 282.3 of the Criminal Code, in 2019 there were five, in 2020 - four. In the overwhelming majority of cases, this article is used against those who were also charged under Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code. Until now, it has been most often used against Jehovah's Witnesses.


Originally published by ODV-Info, translated with permission.


Ballot stuffing, elections March 18, 2018, Lyubertsy. Image - Golos

Less than two months before the elections, the Russian Central Election Commission (CEC) decided to scrap open video broadcasts from the polling stations, which have been the feature of Russian elections since 2012.

1st of May Demonstration in Moscow. 2010. Image - Flickr/TMY7892

PART 1: United Russia

According to sociologists, the same four parties represented in the parliament now: United Russia, the Communist Party of Russian Federation (CPRF), the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), and Just Russia will probably be elected again in 2021. How are these four parties organized? What is their support base in regions?

Ballot box for voting on Constitutional Amendments 2020. Photo - Wikimedia Commons

Since the last State Duma elections in 2016, lawmakers have introduced 19 amendments to the election law. In the year leading up to the State Duma elections in September 2021 alone, seven significant legislative amendments have been introduced, six of them in less than four months before the start of the campaign.

TV reporter, Bryansk. Photo - pxfuel

After almost a decade of crackdowns on big players, the landscape of critical journalism in Russia is dominated by local or smaller niche projects. But if the 2020-2021 trend of relentless attacks on media, journalists, and bloggers continues, many of these small projects are not likely to survive into the autumn. The regime makes it pretty clear that it no longer intends to tolerate any dissent.

"1941- ssshhh!" - Image by James Vaughan / flickr

The laws on "foreign agent" and "undesirable organizations" continue to hamper the work of affected organizations, stigmatize and damage their reputation, and isolate the civil society from international cooperation and support. What are these provisions and how are they being applied?

Vladimir Putin Speech at State Duma plenary session 2020-03-10. Image - Wikimedia Commons

The Russian State Duma's seventh convocation is coming to the end of its five-year term. And according to a new report from iStories and Znak.com, dozens of its deputies haven't said a word in a parliamentary session since they were elected in 2016. Others haven't put forward a single bill. Be that as it may, this hasn't stopped these lawmakers from collecting high salaries and planning to put their names on the ballot for the State Duma election coming up in September.

Kaluga. A Holiday. Image - flickr

During the United Russia primaries, experts detected possible falsification of the results and instances of interference in the electronic voting process. According to some analyses, 99% of votes for the first 22 candidates on the United Russia party list were falsified while the amount of falsified votes for candidates in single-mandate constituencies reached 80-95% of the votes cast.

Arrest by the police. Image - Wikimedia Commons

According to election observers, recent amendments further limiting citizens' passive suffrage constitute a "fifth wave" of depriving Russians of their right to stand for election since the collapse of the USSR. New restrictions have a particular impact on politically active citizens.

Programming, computing and information concept. Image - Peshkova, Getty Images Pro

In May, the Russian Federation has tested a new system of remote electronic voting. The Movement in Defense of Voters’ Rights "Golos" observed the testing phase, took part in the voting, and shared their conclusions and recommendations in a respective report.

"I have the right to choose!" Photo - EPDE.

Opportunities for independent citizen election observation and civil society space in general have been shrinking steadily in Russia over the past decade. Recently, further restrictions have been adopted that limit the ability of citizens to independently monitor electoral processes.

Russian police prevents an illegal meeting at city center. Photo by Farhad Sadykov/flickr. CC BY 2.0

Over the past 14 years, the authorities have blocked 120,000 candidates from participating in elections of various levels, depriving millions of Russian citizens of the right to choose their representatives.

A demonstration in Moscow. Image - by Andrey, Pxhere.

Russia has finally outlawed Alexey Navalny's political and anti-corruption movement. Here's how the crackdown affects activists, journalists, and ordinary supporters.

Plenary meeting of the State Duma. Image - Wikimedia Commons

The President of Russia approved the law prohibiting those who are "involved" in the activities of an extremist organization from running in elections.

Electoral headquarters of Alexey Navalny. Photo - Wikimedia Commons

On June 9, the Moscow City Court, based on the charges by the Moscow Prosecutor's Office, recognized the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), the Foundation for the Protection of Citizens' Rights, and the headquarters of Alexei Navalny as extremist organizations. Now, many citizens are under a threat of pressure and persecution.

Vladimir Putin at the United Russia Congress (2011-11-27). Image - Wikimedia Commons

Between May 24 and 30, United Russia held its preliminary selection of candidates for 2021 State Duma elections. Nearly 12 million citizens participated in the party's primaries. Yet, a more careful examination shows an increasingly controlled and non-transparent process, aimed at having the public formally 'endorse' a carefully vetted list of pre-selected candidates.

Meeting of Central Election Commission Chair Ella Pamfilova with OSCE / ODIHR Director Matteo Mecacci. Photo - CEC

Between 2003 and 2018, OSCE/ODIHR published 139 recommendations on how to improve the conduct of elections in Russia. In the run-up to the State Duma elections in 2021, Russia has fully implemented just over 10% of them. Some have been tackled more promptly than others.

Man using computers. Photo by: Lisa Fotios from Pexels

Ahead of the State Duma election on September 19, 2021, Russia just tested its remote electronic voting system. While the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation (CEC) is preparing the report about the results of the test, election monitors say Russia's electronic voting system is a black box.

Alexei Navalny. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

The Russian authorities are expected to orchestrate a result in the upcoming State Duma elections that will give United Russia a clear majority of seats. This does not mean, however, that the manipulation of the electoral process by the authorities is complete. In a limited number of competitive districts, true opposition candidates including candidates who are associated with Aleksei Navalny have a real chance of winning if they are allowed to run. In recent weeks, steps have been taken to block these 'undesirable' candidates from participating.

Central Election Commission (CEC) of Russian Federation during April 21, 2021, meeting. Photo by: CEC.

On March 19, 2021, the new composition of the Central Election Commission (CEC) of the Russian Federation was revealed. Out of 15 members, eight new people joined the CEC. In particular, the new Commission has been 'reinforced' by bureaucrats from the Presidential Administration, the State Duma, and the Civic Chamber (a consultative civil society institution closely linked to the government).